![]() Microsoft may take a lot of flak, but one thing they actually do very well is listen to their customers and when their customers told them in no uncertain terms that the original “compact” design was extremely flawed at its intended purpose of making it easier to travel with… Microsoft listened. This was certainly interesting and unique, but when you are dealing with a laptop bag, storage length is not an issue but width is an issue and boy did the original Arc take up a lot of room in a laptop bag. ![]() With the original Arc, the mouse basically was hinged in the center and turned from a long and tall full-sized mouse into a fairly compact ball (or a clam). The biggest change is in how they transform their shape for storage. They have the same overall “arc” design where only the front and back of the mouse actually touch and thus have very similar ergonomics and handling characteristics but in the actual function of this mouse they are radically different. Please don’t get me wrong, on a quick cursory glance the two generations of Arc mice do look very similar. In what is a very bold move, this mouse is almost completely different in all the key areas. ![]() While the overall shape and appearance is very similar to that of the original, the all new Arc Touch is not simply a product refresh with one new feature.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |